LSAT-TEST Lsat Test Practice Questions
Prepare for LSAT-TEST with more than an answer.
- Exam fee
- $248 USD
- Level
- Graduate School Admission Test
Domains covered on the exam 3
- Logical Reasoning50%
- Reading Comprehension25%
- LSAT Argumentative Writing (Unscored)
- 1
Educator: Standardized tests are a poor measure of student learning. True learning involves curiosity, critical thinking, and creativity—qualities that cannot be captured by multiple-choice questions. Therefore, schools that 'teach to the test' are failing to provide a genuine education. The educator's conclusion depends on assuming which one of the following?
Show answer details
Correct answer: B
The argument moves from the premise that 'teaching to the test' fails to teach qualities like creativity, to the conclusion that this is not a 'genuine education'. This logical leap only works if a 'genuine education' must include those qualities. This option provides that necessary link. Without this assumption, there is a gap in the reasoning; perhaps a genuine education could consist of other things not measured by the test.
- 2
Historian: The collapse of the ancient Rivanian civilization is often attributed to foreign invasion. However, our recent analysis of ice cores from the period reveals a prolonged, severe drought that coincides exactly with the Rivanian decline. Since agriculture was the bedrock of their society, this drought would have caused widespread famine and social unrest, making the civilization vulnerable. This strongly suggests the primary cause of collapse was environmental, not military. Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the historian's argument?
Show answer details
Correct answer: D
The historian's argument seeks to replace the 'foreign invasion' theory with the 'environmental collapse' theory. This option directly weakens the competing theory. If there is little archaeological evidence of invasion or major battles, it makes the military explanation less likely. By reducing the plausibility of the main alternative, this finding strengthens the historian's environmental argument by default.
- 3
Philosopher: Some neuroscientists claim that our decisions are predetermined by unconscious brain activity, rendering free will an illusion. They point to studies where brain scans predict a subject's choice seconds before the subject is consciously aware of making it. But this conclusion rests on a flawed definition of 'decision.' A true decision is not the final motor command, but the complex, conscious deliberation that precedes it. The brain activity they observe is merely the culmination of this deliberative process, not its cause. Thus, these findings do not disprove free will. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the philosopher's argument?
Show answer details
Correct answer: C
The philosopher's entire defense rests on redefining the predictive brain activity as the 'culmination' of a conscious deliberative process. This option directly severs that link. If the predictive activity is tied to random fluctuations and is unrelated to conscious deliberation, then it cannot be the culmination of that deliberation. This destroys the philosopher's counter-explanation and re-establishes the neuroscientists' claim that the choice is determined by factors outside of conscious control.
- 4
The following passage is adapted from a text on legal history.
The 'reasonable person' standard is a cornerstone of tort law, providing a benchmark against which a defendant's conduct is judged. Originating in 19th-century English common law, this hypothetical individual was conceived as a composite of the community's judgment, an embodiment of ordinary prudence. The standard was intended to be objective, preventing the law from being subject to the varied, and often substandard, capacities of individuals. If a person's conduct falls below the standard of a reasonable person, they may be found negligent.
However, this supposedly neutral standard has faced significant criticism, particularly from feminist and critical race theorists. These critics argue that the 'reasonable man,' as he was originally known, was implicitly modeled on the perspectives and experiences of the dominant social group: propertied, white men. Consequently, the standard may fail to account for the lived realities of women and minority groups. For instance, a woman's perception of a threat in a sexual harassment case might be deemed 'unreasonable' when judged against a standard that does not incorporate the realities of gendered violence. Similarly, what constitutes 'reasonable' behavior for a person of color interacting with law enforcement might differ significantly from the expectations of the traditional model.
In response to these critiques, some legal scholars have advocated for modifying the standard. Proposals include contextualizing the reasonable person by incorporating the defendant's identity and social group, or abandoning the single standard in favor of multiple standards tailored to different communities. Opponents of these changes, however, warn that such fragmentation could lead to a loss of objectivity and predictability in the law, reintroducing the very subjectivity the standard was designed to prevent. The debate continues, reflecting a fundamental tension between the law's aspiration for universal, objective principles and its need to deliver justice in a diverse and unequal society.
The primary purpose of the passage is to
Show answer details
Correct answer: C
This option accurately captures the three-part structure of the passage. Paragraph 1 explains the standard. Paragraph 2 discusses criticisms. Paragraph 3 outlines the debate over reform and the counterarguments. The passage presents these different facets of the issue without taking a definitive stance itself.
- 5
A technology company has the following protocol for project approval:
- A project proposal must be reviewed by either the Legal department or the Compliance department.
- If a project is reviewed by the Legal department, it must also be reviewed by the Finance department.
- A project cannot be reviewed by both the Compliance department and the Finance department.
- Any project that is approved must have been reviewed by exactly two departments.
If a project was approved, which of the following must be true?
flowchart TD A[Proposal] --> B{Legal or Compliance?} B -->|Legal| C[Legal Review] C --> D[Finance Review] B -->|Compliance| E[Compliance Review] subgraph Approved_Path_1 C --> D end subgraph Approved_Path_2 E --> F((Another Dept not Finance)) end D --> G{Approved?} E --> GShow answer details
Correct answer: B
Let's trace the logic. An approved project must have exactly two reviews (Rule 4). There are two initial paths: Legal or Compliance (Rule 1).
Path 1: If Legal reviews it, Finance MUST also review it (Rule 2). This gives us Legal + Finance, which is exactly two departments. This is a valid path to approval.
Path 2: If Compliance reviews it, it CANNOT be reviewed by Finance (Rule 3). To get to two reviews for approval, it would need a third, unnamed department. The rules don't provide for this. Therefore, the only way for a project to be approved under these rules is to go through Legal and Finance. Thus, any approved project must have been reviewed by the Finance department. - 6
A city planner argues: 'In the five years since we installed protected bicycle lanes on major avenues, the number of reported cycling accidents has decreased by 30%. This demonstrates the unequivocal success of the bicycle lane project in improving cyclist safety.' The reasoning in the city planner's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it
Show answer details
Correct answer: C
The argument's primary flaw is that it assumes the bicycle lanes caused the decrease in accidents simply because the lanes were installed before the decrease was observed. This is a classic correlation-causation fallacy. Other factors could be responsible, such as a city-wide decrease in traffic, a new helmet law, or fewer people cycling overall. The argument fails to eliminate these alternative explanations.
- 7
Financial Analyst: 'Innovatech Corp's stock price has risen by over 20% in each of the past three years, a period during which they launched three groundbreaking products. Given their announcement of another major product launch this quarter, we can confidently expect another year of at least 20% growth for Innovatech's stock.' The analyst's conclusion logically depends on which of the following assumptions?
Show answer details
Correct answer: B
The analyst's argument projects past performance into the future based on a single recurring condition (a product launch). For this projection to be valid, the analyst must assume that the key variable—the success of the product launch—will be consistent with past launches. If the new product fails, the entire basis for the prediction of stock growth collapses. Therefore, this assumption is necessary for the conclusion to hold. The other options are not strictly necessary for the argument to work.
- 8
Archaeologist: The peculiar wear patterns on this flint artifact suggest it was used for scraping animal hides. Some critics, however, argue the patterns could have been caused by natural tumbling in a riverbed over centuries. Our recent discovery that the artifact was found in a sealed, arid cave, far from any ancient river, supports our initial hypothesis. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the archaeologist's argument?
Show answer details
Correct answer: C
The archaeologist's argument rests on discrediting the alternative explanation (river tumbling). This option directly attacks the physical evidence that would be expected if the alternative explanation were true. By showing that evidence of water erosion is absent, it significantly weakens the 'riverbed' theory and, by elimination, strengthens the 'scraping tool' hypothesis.
- 9
In a certain legislature, a bill can only be introduced by a committee. Any bill that is approved by a majority of the committee in which it originates is then sent to the floor for a general vote. A bill becomes law only if it is approved by a majority of the committee and then receives a two-thirds majority of the general vote on the floor. However, any committee member who votes against a bill in their own committee is not permitted to vote on that same bill if it reaches the floor. If the statements above are true, which of the following must also be true?
Show answer details
Correct answer: D
For a bill to become law, it needs a 2/3 majority of the general vote. However, any committee members who voted against the bill are barred from this vote. Since the bill only needed a simple majority (e.g., 6 out of 10) to leave committee, there could be committee members who opposed it. These dissenters (e.g., 4 members) cannot vote on the floor. This means the pool of voters from the committee is reduced, and those who can vote from the committee are all supporters. It is mathematically very difficult, and often impossible, for the remaining committee members alone to constitute a 2/3 majority of the entire legislature. Therefore, support from non-committee members is essential. This statement must be true.
- 10
A public health official stated, 'Our city's new program, which provides free, fresh vegetables at community centers, is clearly working. In the year since the program began, hospital admissions for diet-related illnesses like type 2 diabetes and hypertension have fallen by 15%.' Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the official's argument?
Show answer details
Correct answer: B
This option introduces a significant alternative cause (a confounding variable) for the observed health improvement. If the same people benefiting from the vegetable program also started exercising more, it becomes impossible to attribute the 15% drop in hospital admissions solely to the vegetable program. The improved health outcomes could be due to exercise, the vegetables, or a combination of both, thus weakening the official's direct causal claim about the program's success.
